To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.

 
 

Description

Purpose: DNA extraction kits are traditionally developed to work with liquid tissues such as blood, saliva, and swabs, but some have been proposed to work with solid tissues. Somatic variation in cancers can be important for tumor subtyping and treatment guidance, including ocular tumors. Additionally, epigenetic marks such as 5-methylcytosine (5mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) are tissue-specific and change in disease states, particularly evident in diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration. Commercial DNA extraction kits are available from several vendors, but the various kits have different strengths and weaknesses, and the removal of PCR inhibitors will vary with each kit. This project investigates the yield and purity of DNA from ocular tissues using commercial DNA extraction kits.

Methods: Cornea, neural retina, RPE/choroid layer, optic nerve, and capsular bag were collected and aliquoted into 15 mg aliquots. Extractions were performed using the following kits: DNEasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen;), GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific), Monarch HMW DNA Extraction Kit for Tissue (New England Biosciences), and genomicPrep Mini Spin Kit (Cytiva). DNA was quantified using the Qubit Fluorometer and molecular weight was checked by agarose gel. Several more kits are currently being tested.

Results: All four kits yielded high molecular weight DNA (above 20 kbp). The Monarch HMW kit yielded DNA with significantly higher molecular weights. The DNA yields per milligram of tissue were highest using the DNEasy Blood and Tissue Kit for optic nerve, neural retina, and RPE/choroid. The yield was highest for the cornea using the genomicPrep Mini Spin Kit. Only the genomicPrep Mini Spin Kit yielded sufficient DNA for quantification from the capsular bag, and total yields were minimal (600 ng or less). Additional kits are currently being tested, but initial results indicate that several commercial kits will be sufficient for DNA extraction of ocular tissues. Further work is needed to purify epithelial cells and stem cells from the intraocular lens.

Conclusions: Of the kits tested, all are sufficient to obtain significant amounts of DNA from all ocular tissues aside from the capsular bag. The Monarch HMW yielded the highest molecular weight, but significantly lower quantities of DNA than the other kits, indicating that it may not be ideal for most purposes. Protocol development for the capsular bag is still underway.

Disciplines

Medical Education | Medical Sciences | Medicine and Health Sciences | Primary Care

Document Type

Event

Share

COinS
 

DNA Extraction Method Development for Ocular Tissues

Purpose: DNA extraction kits are traditionally developed to work with liquid tissues such as blood, saliva, and swabs, but some have been proposed to work with solid tissues. Somatic variation in cancers can be important for tumor subtyping and treatment guidance, including ocular tumors. Additionally, epigenetic marks such as 5-methylcytosine (5mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) are tissue-specific and change in disease states, particularly evident in diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration. Commercial DNA extraction kits are available from several vendors, but the various kits have different strengths and weaknesses, and the removal of PCR inhibitors will vary with each kit. This project investigates the yield and purity of DNA from ocular tissues using commercial DNA extraction kits.

Methods: Cornea, neural retina, RPE/choroid layer, optic nerve, and capsular bag were collected and aliquoted into 15 mg aliquots. Extractions were performed using the following kits: DNEasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen;), GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific), Monarch HMW DNA Extraction Kit for Tissue (New England Biosciences), and genomicPrep Mini Spin Kit (Cytiva). DNA was quantified using the Qubit Fluorometer and molecular weight was checked by agarose gel. Several more kits are currently being tested.

Results: All four kits yielded high molecular weight DNA (above 20 kbp). The Monarch HMW kit yielded DNA with significantly higher molecular weights. The DNA yields per milligram of tissue were highest using the DNEasy Blood and Tissue Kit for optic nerve, neural retina, and RPE/choroid. The yield was highest for the cornea using the genomicPrep Mini Spin Kit. Only the genomicPrep Mini Spin Kit yielded sufficient DNA for quantification from the capsular bag, and total yields were minimal (600 ng or less). Additional kits are currently being tested, but initial results indicate that several commercial kits will be sufficient for DNA extraction of ocular tissues. Further work is needed to purify epithelial cells and stem cells from the intraocular lens.

Conclusions: Of the kits tested, all are sufficient to obtain significant amounts of DNA from all ocular tissues aside from the capsular bag. The Monarch HMW yielded the highest molecular weight, but significantly lower quantities of DNA than the other kits, indicating that it may not be ideal for most purposes. Protocol development for the capsular bag is still underway.